This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Reassurance and explanation

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

  • the need for reassurance may be the main, often the sole, reason for the patient presenting to the doctor
  • inappropriate reassurance is dangerous to the patient and damaging to the doctor's credibility and should be as planned and deliberate as any other medical skill
  • reassurance is unlikely to be effective without an appropriate degree of explanation, as well as adequate history-taking and examination. The doctor needs to explore the patient's understanding and fears concerning the symptoms, especially such potentially sinister symptoms and signs as chest pain, headache or a lump
  • reassurance requires trust and this depends on good communication. The doctor has to take into account differences in patients' intelligence and education, medical experience, ethnic background, social class and personality
  • reassurance also carries more weight if there is a strong bond between doctor and patient. This comes from continuity of care, which may make it easier for the patient to accept the doctor's judgment

Create an account to add page annotations

Add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation, such as a web address or phone number. This information will always be displayed when you visit this page

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.