This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination

Authoring team

With respect to the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination:

  • in adults:
    • polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines (PPV) do not appear to reduce the incidence of pneumonia or death in adults with or without chronic illness, or in the elderly (55 years and above) (1)
      • evidence suggests that pneumococcal vaccines are effective in the reducing the incidence of the more specific outcome, invasive pneumococcal disease, among adults and the immunocompetent elderly (55 years and above). However surveillance data suggest that infection rates vary widely between and also within countries, but a typical figure in developed countries is 0.01%, or 10 per 100,000 per year. If an efficacy of 50% is assumed then this corresponds to a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 20,000 vaccinations per infection avoided, and perhaps 50,000 vaccinations per death avoided
    • a more recent meta-analysis concluded that pneumococcal vaccination is not effective for preventing pneumonia, bacteraemia, bronchitis or mortality in adults (2)
  • in children under 2 years of age (3):
    • pneumococcal vaccination is effective in reducing the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease from all serotypes but exerts a greater effect in reducing vaccine serotypes invasive pneumococcal disease
  • in patients with sickle cell disease (4):
    • a systematic review recommended that conjugate pneumococcal vaccines are used in people with sickle cell disease
  • as a measure to prevent recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) (5,6):
    • a systematic review concluded that use of pneumococcal polysaccharide and conjugate vaccination for this specific indication is not yet recommended (5)
    • a more recent systematic reveiw regarding pneumococcal conjugate vaccines concluded that based on current evidence of the effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for the prevention of AOM, the currently licensed 7-valent PCV administered during infancy has marginal beneficial effects
    • administering PCV7 in older children with a history of AOM appears to have no benefit in preventing further episodes.

Notes:

  • the Green book chapter states that
    • "...Most healthy adults develop a good antibody response to a single dose of PPV by the third week following immunisation. Antibody response may be reduced in those with immunological impairment and those with an absent or dysfunctional spleen. Children younger than two years of age show poor antibody responses to immunisation with PPV. It is difficult to reach firm conclusions about the effectiveness of PPV, but overall efficacy in preventing pneumococcal bacteraemia is probably 50 to 70%... Current evidence suggests that PPV is not effective in protecting against non-bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia. It does not prevent otitis media or exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The vaccine is relatively ineffective in patients with multiple myeloma, Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (especially during treatment) and chronic alcoholism...The vaccine does not protect against pneumococcal infection due to capsular types not contained in the vaccine, but the 23 types included account for about 96% of the pneumococcal isolates that cause serious infection in the UK..."

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation, such as a web address or phone number. This information will always be displayed when you visit this page

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.