This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

ATLAS

Authoring team

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parellel-group trial enrolled 3000 patients with chronic heart failure and an ejection fraction of <30%.

The aim of the trial was to determine whether a high or low dose of lisinopril is optimal in prolonging the life of patients with heart failure.

Results:

  • there was no significant difference between the groups (low dose lisinopril, high dose lisinopril) for all cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality
  • however high dose lisinopril was more effective than low dose lisinopril for reducing the combined endpoints of all cause mortality combined with either cardiovascular admissions to hospital, congestive heart failure admissions to hospital, or all admissions to hospital. Also the high dose group had lower rates of cardiovascular mortality plus cardiovascular admissions to hospital

Reference:

  • (1) Packer M, Poole-Wilson PA, Armstrong PW, et al, on behalf of the ATLAS Study Group (1999). Comparative effects of low and high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. Circulation, 100, 2312-8.

Create an account to add page annotations

Add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation, such as a web address or phone number. This information will always be displayed when you visit this page

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.